Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
The authors present their systematic empirical research on the conventional validity of Pragma-Dialectical discussion rules, grounded in a well-defined theoretical framework. They detail a series of experimental tests conducted to evaluate these rules, providing insights into their effectiveness and applicability in discussions.
"Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness" by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels explores the validity of pragma-dialectical discussion rules through over a decade of empirical research. The authors examine how ordinary arguers perceive fallacies versus non-fallacies, offering insights into the interplay between theoretical and practical reasonableness.
Overtuigend schrijven is een doelgerichte methode waarmee de student systematisch verschillende soorten betogende teksten leert schrijven.Het boek vertaalt voor de student de nieuwste theoretische inzichten van de moderne argumentatieleer naar de praktische toepassing ervan in verschillende tekstgenres.