An Errant Glossary
What’s in a prefix? How to read a prefix as short as ‘re-’? Does ‘re-’ really signify? Can it point into a specific direction? Can it reverse? Can it become the shibboleth of a ‘postcritical’ reboot? At first glance transparent and directional, ‘re-’ complicates the linear and teleological models commonly accepted as structuring the relations between past, present, and future, opening onto errant temporalities.
How can the power of wholes be resisted without essentializing their parts? Drawing on different archives and methodologies, including aesthetics, history, biology, affect, race, and queer, the interventions in this volume explore different ways of troubling the consistency and stability of wholes, breaking up their closure and making them more dynamic. Doing so without necessarily presupposing or producing parts, an outside, or a teleological development, they indicate the critical potential of partiality without parts.
Multistable figures offer an intriguing model for arbitrating conflicting positions. Moving back and forth between different aspects, one recognizes that contradictory descriptions of a situation can be equally valid and that disputes over the correct account can be settled without dissolving differences or establishing a higher synthesis. Yet, the experience of a gestalt switch also offers a model for radical conversions and revolutions, that is, for irreversible leaps to incommensurable alternatives foiling ideals of rational choice while providing the possibility and necessity of decision. Accentuating the temporal dimensions of multistable figures, this multidisciplinary volume illuminates the critical potential and limits of multistability as a complex figure of thought.
Tension appears in many contexts and carries diverse meanings. It tends to be viewed as something to be avoided and reduced in politics; to be explained, worked through, and resolved in therapy or science; to be endured and sustained in modern art; or to be sought after and enjoyed in popular culture. This volume brings together contributions from several academic and artistic fields in order to question the self-evidence of the deceptively simple term ‘tension’ and explore the possibility of productive transfers among different forms und understandings of tension. Refusing the temptation of a stabilizing synthesis, it establishes a dense web of approaches, providing a new critical paradigm for further inquiry.
Seit einigen Jahrzehnten machen die Neuro- und Kognitionswissenschaften das ‚Organ’ der Erkenntnis – das Gehirn und damit auch das Bewusstsein oder den ‚Geist’ – zum Erkenntnisobjekt empirischer Analysen. Nur scheinbar unterliegen damit traditionelle und insbesondere mystische Welt- und Menschenbilder endgültig der wissenschaftlichen Entzauberung. Im Gegensatz zur mystischen setzt die wissenschaftliche Erkenntnis die Trennung von erkennendem Subjekt und Erkenntnisobjekt voraus und abstrahiert von der Leiblichkeit und den subjektiven Erlebnisgehalten des Erkennenden. Gerade in der Hirnforschung wird aber die Trennung von Subjekt und Objekt erneut problematisch, verstrickt sich das naturwissenschaftliche Projekt in Schwindel erregende Paradoxien, zu deren Bereinigung wiederum neue Theorien und Symboliken eingeführt werden müssen. Inwieweit sich hier Konstruktionen ergeben, die der Mystik ähnlich sind, erkundet der vorliegende Band aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven.