Dieser Text ist ein Klassiker der vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft. In den 1960er Jahren erarbeitete Juan Linz am Beispiel des Franco-Regimes das Konzept eines dritten Regimetyps neben Demokratie und Totalitarismus. Es sollte der wirkungsmächtige Anstoß zum Nachdenken über autoritäre Regime werden: Ein Nachdenken, das angesichts aktueller weltpolitischer Entwicklungen fortgesetzt werden muss - und wozu diese erste deutschsprachige Übersetzung des Klassikers einen Beitrag leistet.
Since their classic volume The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes was published in 1978, Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan have increasingly focused on the questions of how, in the modern world, nondemocratic regimes can be eroded and democratic regimes crafted. In Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, they break new ground in numerous areas. They reconceptualize the major types of modern nondemocratic regimes and point out for each type the available paths to democratic transition and the tasks of democratic consolidation. They argue that, although "nation-state" and "democracy" often have conflicting logics, multiple and complementary political identities are feasible under a common roof of state-guaranteed rights. They also illustrate how, without an effective state, there can be neither effective citizenship nor successful privatization. Further, they provide criteria and evidence for politicians and scholars alike to distinguish between democratic consolidation and pseudo-democratization, and they present conceptually driven survey data for the fourteen countries studied. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation contains the first systematic comparative analysis of the process of democratic consolidation in southern Europe and the southern cone of South America, and it is the first book to ground post-Communist Europe within the literature of comparative politics and democratic theory.
Originally a chapter in the "Handbook of Political Science," this analysis develops the fundamental destinction between totalitarian and authoritarian systems. It emphasizes the personalistic, lawless, non-ideological type of authoritarian rule the author calls the "sultanistic regime."