Douglas Walton è un accademico canadese rinomato per il suo vasto lavoro sull'argomentazione, le fallacie logiche e la logica informale. La sua ricerca ha trovato applicazioni pratiche nella formulazione di argomenti legali e nel progresso dell'intelligenza artificiale. Ispirando studenti a livello globale, le teorie di Walton continuano a essere una fonte di ispirazione e trovano applicazioni sempre maggiori, in particolare nell'informatica. I suoi significativi contributi alla teoria dell'argomentazione hanno ottenuto riconoscimenti internazionali.
This book, written by a leading expert, and based on the latest research, shows how to apply methods of argumentation to a range of interesting examples. Written in a nontechnical style, the book explains what you most need to know by applying the methods to many real examples of arguments found in everyday conversational exchanges and legal argumentation.
The exploration of fallacy in this book unfolds through an examination of Aristotle's reasoning mistakes and sophisms, enriched by the insights of pragma-dialecticians. It culminates in the development of a 'new' pragmatic theory, offering a fresh perspective on logical errors and their implications in reasoning.
Exploring the significance of abductive inference, this book delves into its application in everyday reasoning and the context of legal evidence. It examines how this form of reasoning helps individuals draw conclusions from incomplete information, highlighting its importance in argumentative discourse and judicial processes. By analyzing various scenarios, the work emphasizes the interplay between logic, reasoning, and practical decision-making in both personal and legal frameworks.
The book introduces a method for critically assessing the relevance of arguments through case studies, blending insights from argumentation theory, logic, and artificial intelligence. It aims to enhance understanding for scholars and students in the fields of argumentation and rhetoric, providing a fresh perspective on evaluating arguments' significance and effectiveness.
This first book in the Applied Logic Series by Doug Walton explores the fallacies of ambiguity in practical reasoning. It addresses the growing interest in analyzing human reasoning across various fields, such as AI, philosophy, and linguistics, and highlights Walton's contributions to developing applicable formal logical systems.
The book offers a comprehensive examination of various methods used for argument identification, presenting a systematic survey and clarification of existing tests. Walton assesses their effectiveness, providing insights into the nuances of argumentation analysis. This work is essential for understanding the complexities of identifying arguments in diverse contexts, making it a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners in the field.
"Scare Tactics" explores the reasoning behind fear-based arguments, traditionally seen as fallacies. Through case studies from various fields, it analyzes how these arguments persuade and evaluates their validity. The book aims to clarify their structure and offers methods for identifying and assessing their use, appealing to a wide audience in academia and beyond.
Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation presents the basic tools for the identification, analysis, and evaluation of common arguments for beginners. The book teaches by using examples of arguments in dialogues, both in the text itself and in the exercises. Examples of controversial legal, political, and ethical arguments are analyzed.
The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting
Exploring the concept of straw man argumentation, this book connects linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric through a detailed analysis of how individuals distort others' words in debates. It provides 63 examples from various contexts, including politics and legal cases, to illustrate the tactics of misquoting and misreporting. By applying tools from argumentation theory, the author offers insights into assessing the accuracy of statements and defending against distortions, making it a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners in communication and rhetoric.
Focusing on the intersection of applied ethics and ethical theory, this book utilizes recent advancements in argumentation theory to create a practical model for ethical justification. It explores how ethical arguments are constructed and understood in real-world contexts, providing insights into the dynamics of moral reasoning and decision-making.