Entwicklung, Markt und Moral
- 304pagine
- 11 ore di lettura
Albert Otto Hirschman è stato un economista e autore i cui contributi spaziavano nell'economia politica e nell'ideologia. Il suo lavoro iniziale sull'economia dello sviluppo sostenne il concetto di crescita squilibrata, sostenendo che gli squilibri dovrebbero essere incoraggiati per stimolare la mobilitazione delle risorse, specialmente nelle nazioni in via di sviluppo prive di competenze decisionali. Sostenne la promozione di industrie con forti legami interaziendali. Successivamente, esplorò l'economia politica attraverso due quadri influenti: il primo, presentato in "Exit, Voice, and Loyalty", delineò le risposte fondamentali al declino (abbandonare, parlare o rimanere leali); il secondo, in "The Rhetoric of Reaction", dissezionò gli argomenti comuni usati dai conservatori contro il progresso sociale.







Anschaulich und präzise deckt der international angesehene Wirtschaftstheoretiker Albert O. Hirschman die drei Grundfiguren reaktionären Argumentierens gestern und heute auf. Die erste besagt, daß jeder Versuch, bestimmte Gegebenheiten zu verbessern, nur die Lage verschlimmere. Die zweite These beharrt darauf, daß jede Veränderung vergeblich sei und am Lauf der Geschichte nichts ändern könne. Das dritte Argument schließlich unterstellt, daß eine Veränderung zwar wünschenswert, aber leider unbezahlbar sei. Hirschman überzeugt davon, daß nur ein beständiger Kommunikationsprozeß diese Form des Argumentierens überwinden kann.
An innovator in contemporary thought on economic and political development looks here at decline rather than growth. Albert O. Hirschman makes a basic distinction between alternative ways of reacting to deterioration in business firms and, in general, to dissatisfaction with organizations: one, "exit," is for the member to quit the organization or for the customer to switch to the competing product, and the other, "voice," is for members or customers to agitate and exert influence for change "from within." The efficiency of the competitive mechanism, with its total reliance on exit, is questioned for certain important situations. As exit often undercuts voice while being unable to counteract decline, loyalty is seen in the function of retarding exit and of permitting voice to play its proper role. The interplay of the three concepts turns out to illuminate a wide range of economic, social, and political phenomena. As the author states in the preface, "having found my own unifying way of looking at issues as diverse as competition and the two-party system, divorce and the American character, black power and the failure of 'unhappy' top officials to resign over Vietnam, I decided to let myself go a little."
Reconstructs the intellectual climate of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to illuminate the intricate ideological transformation that occurred, wherein the pursuit of material interests - so long condemned as the deadly sin of avarice - was assigned the role of containing the unruly and destructive passions of man.