Maurice Godelier Libri

A masterwork of the anthropology of kinship by the heir to Levi-Strauss

Groundbreaking examination of the relationship between thought, economy and society.

First Vintage Books Edition, March 1973. Mild shelf wear, small tear at top of back cover, pages moderately tanned, and spine has creases from reading. Everything looks good and perfectly readable. Overall pretty decent condition.

Exploring the role of the incest prohibition in human societies

Exploring the close relationship between the real and the symbolic and imaginary What you imagined is not always imaginary, but everything that is imaginary is imagined. It is by imagining that people make the impossible become possible. In mythology or religion, however, those things that are imagined are never experienced as being imaginary by believers. The realm of the imagined is even more real than the real; it is super-real, surreal. Lévi-Strauss held that "the real, the symbolic and the imaginary" are three separate orders. Maurice Godelier demonstrates the contrary: that the real is not separate from the symbolic and the imaginary. For instance, for a portion of humanity, rituals and sacred objects and places attest to the reality and therefore the truth that God, gods or spirits exist. The symbolic enables people to signify what they think and do, encompassing thought, spilling over into the whole body, but also pervading temples, palaces, tools, foods, mountains, the sea, the sky and the earth. It is real. Godelier's book goes to the strategic heart of the social sciences, for to examine the nature and role of the imaginary and the symbolic is also to attempt to account for the basic components of all societies and ultimately of human existence. And these aspects in turn shape our social and personal identity.

This book is the result of a research project begun by the author in 1958 with the aim of answering two questions: First, what is the rationality of the economic systems that appear and disappear throughout history—in other words, what is their hidden logic and the underlying necessity for them to exist, or to have existed? Second, what are the conditions for a rational understanding of these systems—in other words, for a fully developed comparative economic science? The field of investigation opened up by these two questions is vast, touching on the foundations of social reality and on how to understand them. The author, being a Marxist, sought the answers, as he writes, ‘not in philosophy or by philosophical means, but in and through examining the knowledge accumulated by the sciences.’ The stages of his journey from philosophy to economics and then to anthropology are indicated by the divisions of his book. Godelier rejects, at the outset, any attempt to tackle the question of rationality or irrationality of economic science and of economic realities from the angle of an a priori idea, a speculative definition of what is rational. Such an approach can yield only, he feels, an ideological result. Rather, he treats the appearance and disappearance of social and economic systems in history as being governed by a necessity ‘wholly internal to the concrete structures of social life.

Les Baruya sont une société tribale de Nouvelle-Guinée, découverte en 1951 seulement, et qui, à cette époque, abandonnait ses outils de pierre pour des haches et des machettes d'acier dont elle ignorait totalement la provenance. En 1975, la Nouvelle-Guinée devint indépendante, et les Baruya se retrouvèrent citoyens d'un État membre des Nations unies. Maurice Godelier a effectué chez eux de fréquents et longs séjours à partir de 1967, alors que les principes de l'organisation traditionnelle de leur société étaient encore présents dans toutes les mémoires des Baruya. Il nous livre, dans cet ouvrage classique, une fascinante reconstitution de leur ancien mode de vie ainsi que l'analyse des transformations qui ont suivi l'instauration de l'ordre colonial, l'arrivée du marché et de l'argent, celle des missionnaires et du christianisme. On y voit cette petite société, productrice de Grands Hommes, s'intégrer peu à peu dans le nouvel ordre mondial.

Der französische Anthropologe Maurice Godelier beleuchtet in seinem Gespräch mit Camille Kouchner das Inzestverbot als Schlüssel zur Analyse sozialer Hierarchien, Sexualität und Geschlechterrollen in nicht-westlichen Gesellschaften. Durch eine umfassende Reise durch Zeit und Raum zeigt er auf, wie diese Konzepte unterschiedlich konstruiert und gelebt werden, und eröffnet damit neue Perspektiven auf kulturelle Praktiken und soziale Strukturen.