Bookbot

Informal Logic

A Handbook for Critical Argumentation

Valutazione del libro

Parametri

  • 310pagine
  • 11 ore di lettura

Maggiori informazioni sul libro

This is an introductory guide to the basic principles of constructing good arguments and criticizing bad ones. It is nontechnical in its approach, and is based on 150 key examples, each discussed and evaluated in clear, illustrative detail. The author explains how errors, fallacies, and other key failures of argument occur. He shows how correct uses of argument are based on sound argument strategies for reasoned persuasion and critical questions for responding. Among the many subjects covered are: techniques of posing, replying to, and criticizing questions, forms of valid argument, relevance, appeals to emotion, personal attack, uses and abuses of expert opinion, problems in deploying statistics, loaded terms, equivocation, and arguments from analogy.

Acquisto del libro

Informal Logic, Douglas N. Walton

Lingua
Pubblicato
1989
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(In brossura)
Ti avviseremo via email non appena lo rintracceremo.

Metodi di pagamento

4,1
Molto buono
94 Valutazioni

Qui potrebbe esserci la tua recensione.

Titolo
Informal Logic
Sottotitolo
A Handbook for Critical Argumentation
Lingua
Inglese
Pubblicato
1989
Formato
In brossura
Pagine
310
ISBN10
0521379253
ISBN13
9780521379250
Serie
Valutazione
4,05 su 5
Descrizione
This is an introductory guide to the basic principles of constructing good arguments and criticizing bad ones. It is nontechnical in its approach, and is based on 150 key examples, each discussed and evaluated in clear, illustrative detail. The author explains how errors, fallacies, and other key failures of argument occur. He shows how correct uses of argument are based on sound argument strategies for reasoned persuasion and critical questions for responding. Among the many subjects covered are: techniques of posing, replying to, and criticizing questions, forms of valid argument, relevance, appeals to emotion, personal attack, uses and abuses of expert opinion, problems in deploying statistics, loaded terms, equivocation, and arguments from analogy.