Serie
Maggiori informazioni sul libro
The idea of the gene has been a central organizing theme of 20th-century biology, and the Human Genome Project and biotechnological advances have put the gene in the media spotlight. In this text Lenny Moss reviews the history that led to the gene-centered approach of contemporary biology. He offers a critique of this approach and suggests an alternative to it. He also attempts to bring rhetorical analysis back into a productive encounter with empirical science. Moss identifies two distinctly different uses of the concept of the gene, Gene-P and Gene-D-genes as instrumental predictors of phenotypes and genes as developmental resources that specify possible amino acid sequences in proteins. The popular idea that genes provide the blueprints for organisms, claims Moss, arose from the incorrect conflation of these independently valid meanings of the gene.
Acquisto del libro
Basic Bioethics: What Genes Can't Do, Lenny Moss
- Lingua
- Pubblicato
- 2002
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (Copertina rigida)
Metodi di pagamento
Qui potrebbe esserci la tua recensione.
- Titolo
- Basic Bioethics: What Genes Can't Do
- Lingua
- Inglese
- Autori
- Lenny Moss
- Editore
- MIT Press
- Pubblicato
- 2002
- Formato
- Copertina rigida
- Pagine
- 228
- ISBN10
- 026213411X
- ISBN13
- 9780262134118
- Serie
- Bioetica di base
- Valutazione
- 3 su 5
- Descrizione
- The idea of the gene has been a central organizing theme of 20th-century biology, and the Human Genome Project and biotechnological advances have put the gene in the media spotlight. In this text Lenny Moss reviews the history that led to the gene-centered approach of contemporary biology. He offers a critique of this approach and suggests an alternative to it. He also attempts to bring rhetorical analysis back into a productive encounter with empirical science. Moss identifies two distinctly different uses of the concept of the gene, Gene-P and Gene-D-genes as instrumental predictors of phenotypes and genes as developmental resources that specify possible amino acid sequences in proteins. The popular idea that genes provide the blueprints for organisms, claims Moss, arose from the incorrect conflation of these independently valid meanings of the gene.