Bookbot

Setting Aside All Authority

Giovanni Battista Riccioli and the Science against Copernicus in the Age of Galileo

Parametri

  • 288pagine
  • 11 ore di lettura

Maggiori informazioni sul libro

Setting Aside All Authority offers a critical analysis of seventeenth-century scientific arguments against the Copernican system. Christopher M. Graney challenges the notion that the opposition to heliocentrism was primarily driven by religious beliefs or adherence to outdated traditions. Instead, he argues that scientific reasoning played a significant role in this opposition. Utilizing newly translated works from anti-Copernican writers, Graney illustrates how these thinkers, building on Tycho Brahe's contributions, constructed a compelling scientific case against heliocentrism well into the mid-seventeenth century, even after the telescope's introduction. The pinnacle of this scientific argument is exemplified in Giovanni Battista Riccioli's 1651 New Almagest, where he employed meticulous telescopic observations to contest Copernicus. The book features the first English translation of Monsignor Francesco Ingoli’s essay to Galileo, which critiques the Copernican system prior to the Inquisition's condemnation in 1616, alongside excerpts from Riccioli's experiments on falling bodies. Graney’s work is a significant contribution to the history of science and astronomy, prompting a reevaluation of Riccioli’s role and the rationality of the geocentric perspective during this period. It appeals to historians, philosophers of science, and students in related fields.

Acquisto del libro

Setting Aside All Authority, Christopher M. Graney

Lingua
Pubblicato
2015
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(In brossura),
Condizioni del libro
Danneggiato
Prezzo
20,44 €

Metodi di pagamento

Sottotitolo
Giovanni Battista Riccioli and the Science against Copernicus in the Age of Galileo
Lingua
Inglese
Pubblicato
2015
Formato
In brossura
Pagine
288
ISBN10
0268029881
ISBN13
9780268029883
Serie
Descrizione
Setting Aside All Authority offers a critical analysis of seventeenth-century scientific arguments against the Copernican system. Christopher M. Graney challenges the notion that the opposition to heliocentrism was primarily driven by religious beliefs or adherence to outdated traditions. Instead, he argues that scientific reasoning played a significant role in this opposition. Utilizing newly translated works from anti-Copernican writers, Graney illustrates how these thinkers, building on Tycho Brahe's contributions, constructed a compelling scientific case against heliocentrism well into the mid-seventeenth century, even after the telescope's introduction. The pinnacle of this scientific argument is exemplified in Giovanni Battista Riccioli's 1651 New Almagest, where he employed meticulous telescopic observations to contest Copernicus. The book features the first English translation of Monsignor Francesco Ingoli’s essay to Galileo, which critiques the Copernican system prior to the Inquisition's condemnation in 1616, alongside excerpts from Riccioli's experiments on falling bodies. Graney’s work is a significant contribution to the history of science and astronomy, prompting a reevaluation of Riccioli’s role and the rationality of the geocentric perspective during this period. It appeals to historians, philosophers of science, and students in related fields.